Showing 301 - 310 of 322 for "Baker McKenzie" with applied filters
General corporate tax, Indirect tax, Real estate, Tax, Tax controversy, Transactional tax, Transfer pricing
General corporate tax, Tax, Transactional tax, Transfer pricing
Tax, Tax controversy, Transfer pricing
13 July 2023 by
On 3 March 2023, the European Data Protection Supervisor (hereafter, the “EDPS”) responded to the EU Commission’s consultation dated 10 January 2023 on the legislative proposal on VAT reporting obligations, assessing the potential impact on the right to personal data protection, within the package “VAT in the Digital Age”.
05 July 2023 by
It is with immense pleasure that Baker McKenzie Luxembourg announces the promotion of two counsel in the Tax and Transfer Pricing Practice Group, effecting from 1 July 2023.
05 July 2023 by
Baker McKenzie Luxembourg is thrilled to announce the promotion of Olivier Dal Farra to Partner in our tax practice group, effecting from 1 July 2023.
28 June 2023 by
On 9 June 2023, the Luxembourg tax authorities issued a long awaited circular1 ("Circular") on reverse hybrid provisions as set forth under Article 168quater of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law (LITL). The purpose of the Circular is to provide guidance on determining the net income and tax due by taxpayers falling under the scope of Article 168quater LITL, i.e., being reverse hybrids.
15 June 2023 by
On 28 March 2023, the government presented Bill of Law 8186 ("Bill"), which provides a set of amendments to the General Tax Law (Abgabenordnung, AO) dated 22 May 1931. Amongst others, the bill introduces new bilateral and multilateral advance pricing agreement procedures, together with the possibility to issue, withdraw or amend a tax assessment further to a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) or an arbitration decision.
08 June 2023 by
In the past few years, the Luxembourg tax authorities (LTA) have shown a growing interest in the examination of transfer pricing (TP) aspects of transactions carried out by multinational groups.
04 May 2023 by
More than five years ago, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") ruled in the Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH (“Hamamatsu”) case that, according to the former EU customs legislation , a taxpayer cannot make ex post adjustments to customs value based on an intercompany agreement for goods under an advance pricing agreement (“APA”) concluded with the tax authorities.