Tax risk is that faced by companies that may be paying or accounting for an incorrect amount of tax (including income tax and indirect taxes), or that the tax positions taken by a company are incompatible with the tax risk expectations that administrators have approved or consider prudent 1. 

According to the Academy of Tax Law, the types of tax risk can be as follows:

1. Compliance risk: The risk of non-compliance with tax laws, resulting in fines or interest charges, which can be due to errors in tax returns or misunderstandings of tax regulations.
2. Reputational risk: Notorious perception resulting from tax disputes or aggressive tax planning. Strategies can damage an organization's brand.
3. Transactional risk: Uncertainty surrounding the tax implications of specific transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions, or pricing agreements among companies.
4. Operational risk: Risks associated with internal processes, systems, or individuals that can lead to missed tax returns or deadlines.

Global trends indicate that managing tax risk is essential for effective corporate governance. The presence and testing of an internal tax control framework are integral parts of the risk assessment protocols used by tax authorities to establish their tax compliance management planning.

A thorough Transfer Pricing risk assessment shields multinational companies from penalties and tax disputes, while promoting business sustainability and enhancement. Effective risk management through strategic tax planning identifies compliance weaknesses related to the Arm's Length Principle, developing efficient corrective and improvement plans that review current Transfer Pricing policies, conduct internal audits, and utilize the expertise of external advisors to ensure tax compliance and minimize risks.

Tax Risk and Transfer Pricing 

Based on international experience, the following list exemplifies red flags for management regarding Transfer Pricing compliance risk:

  • The company's profits or losses in Chile appear inconsistent with its business activities or the global group's results over consecutive years.
  • The company in Chile provides intangibles but receives no royalties or receives low royalties and seems not to be generating a business reward for its research and development. The other party to the transaction has a high net margin based on what is known about its business activities. 
  • The level of indebtedness seems disproportionately high compared to shareholding funds, considering the type of business treated.
  • Interest rates appear high compared to the company's ability to repay the debt with its operating income before taxes and interest payable. What constitutes "high" is a complex issue, but does the debt burden seem sustainable, along with the company's other requirements and obligations?
  • The transactions do not seem to make commercial sense, for example, the insertion, without an apparent commercial purpose, of a new holding corporation of the group in Chile with substantial debt, especially compared to the position.
  • Related-party transactions in low-tax jurisdictions.
  • Acquisition of a Chilean group by a private capital firm, which will depend on heavy debt financing.
  • Material facts, or other forms of information, such as press or internet articles, mentioning restructuring, acquisition/merger activity, the transfer of activities from Chile to related parties, and/or changes in rewarding the company. 

Several of these factors, jointly rather than individually, may be indicators of a Transfer Pricing issue that management should address.

Transfer Pricing compliance risk can arise when administrations are not sufficiently involved in the processes, or do not pay adequate attention to the planning and scope of Transfer Pricing compliance work during a specific period. 

It can result in Transfer Pricing policies, prices, analyses, and documentation that do not meet current regulations or international standards on Transfer Pricing, which increases the risk of tax audits and, if errors are detected, the risk of tax liabilities, including risks of economic crimes that may eventually arise.   

Transfer Pricing compliance risk may arise if the terms of cross-border transactions set out in the group's formal Transfer Pricing policy and intra-group contracts are not correctly implemented.

On the other hand, monitoring and verifying the implementation of Transfer Pricing policies, intra-group contracts, or informal agreements is important for managing compliance risk. Indeed, clear and consistent Transfer Pricing policies are essential as a guide in business and to ensure compliance with international tax laws. Policies provide a framework for maintaining compliance and managing the complexities of multinational operations. 

Finally, periodic reviews of Transfer Pricing practices help companies anticipate regulatory amendments and avoid penalties. Compliance reviews ensure that Transfer Pricing policies align with the increasingly complex and evolving regulatory landscape.

This environment of increasing international scrutiny requires that companies adopt a preventive and structured approach to managing their Transfer Pricing risks. Specialized advice and ongoing technical support, such as that provided by TPC Group, help strengthen tax governance and mitigate contingencies that could affect the financial sustainability of organizations.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
1. Tax risk refers to the uncertainty surrounding the potential financial or reputational impact of tax-related decisions and events on a company or individual. This risk arises due to several factors, like complex tax regulations, inconsistent interpretations of the tax authority, or evolving international tax laws. Effective tax risk management identifies, assesses, and mitigates potential tax threats to avoid financial penalties, legal disputes, or reputational damage. Source: https://academyoftaxlaw.com/glossary/tax-risk-definition/